Avodah Mailing List

Volume 42: Number 26

Fri, 19 Apr 2024

< Previous Next >
Subjects Discussed In This Issue:
Message: 1
From: Joel Rich
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 20:51:58 -0400
Subject:
[Avodah] Abaye and Rava


The gemara in chulin (105b) has a series of cases where abaye originally
had a rationalist reason for certain practices (eg handwashing) and Raba
corrected (?) him and gave an esoteric reason. While there?s discussion of
the individual cases in the commentaries, I didn?t see any overarching
discussion of Abaye?s original approach (why?) or his (possible) acceptance
of Raba?s approach. Any citations or thoughts?
Bsorot tovot
Joel Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20240416/4cea9628/attachment-0001.htm>


Go to top.

Message: 2
From: Joel Rich
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 20:54:44 -0400
Subject:
[Avodah] no tachanun


Any philosophical explanation as to why no tachanun the mincha prior to
rosh chodesh etc.

bsorot tovot

Joel Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20240416/3800e698/attachment-0001.htm>


Go to top.

Message: 3
From: Micha Berger
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:21:08 -0400
Subject:
Re: [Avodah] Abaye and Rava


On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:51:58PM -- 0400, Joel Rich via Avodah wrote:
> The gemara in chulin (105b) has a series of cases where abaye originally
> had a rationalist reason for certain practices (eg handwashing) and Raba
> corrected (?) him and gave an esoteric reason. While there's discussion of
> the individual cases in the commentaries, I didn't see any overarching
> discussion of Abaye's original approach (why?) or his (possible) acceptance
> of Raba's approach. Any citations or thoughts?

If you had checked the Matmonim source sheets I shared the last times
you asked about a shitah difference between Abayei and Rava, I think
you would have found that this fits R AY Kook's explanation quite closely.

Here's the gemara, Berkhos 48a that RAYK is working with:
    Abayei and Rava, [when they were children,] were seated
    before Rabbah[, Abayei's biological uncle and adoptive father,
    Rava's rebbe].
    Rabbah said to them: "To whom does one recite blessings?"
    They said to him: "To the All-Merciful."
    "And where does the All-Merciful reside?"
    Rava pointed to the ceiling.
    Abaye went outside and pointed toward the heaven.
    Rabbah said to them: "You will both become Sages. It is as people
    would [often] say: 'A cucumber can be recognized from [when it is
    still] blossoming.'"

R Kook (Ayin AYa"H, Berashos ad loc 7:27, pg 216) took this gemara as
more than just a glipse into these two central amoraim as children in
Rabbah's classroon. The comment:
     Rava pointed to the ceiling: Because his tendency was towards the
     diligence of the Torah and the demand for all truth in their limited
     details and in this he came to know his own blessed...

     Abayei, however, aspired to the expansion of knowledge in the
     inner recognition that rises above all limits. His inner nature
     pushed him to express the feelings of his soul about "where does
     the All-Merciful reside?" through "[going] outside and point[ing]
     toward the heaven", toward the endlessness of the universe.

I took this to mean that Rava was more pragmatic, and looked at halakhah
focusing on how people, where we are now, can ascend. Whereas Abayei was
more idealistic, and expected halakhah to pay more attention to helping
us define what it is we are to ascend to.

R David Lapin, who gave the shiur that on the podcast and made the source
sheet, mentions that a sefer called "Davar Qatan" by R Ze'ev Frank, has
a section titled "Yesodos Machlokasam Abayei veRava" that takes RAYK's
idea to 428 (!) machloqesin.

RDL has another shiur where he explains in what ways YaA"L KaGa"M break
this usual pattern to explan why we hold like Abayei in those 6 cases.

Tir'u baTov!
-Micha

-- 
Micha Berger                 There's only one corner of the universe
http://www.aishdas.org/asp   you can be certain of improving,
Author: Widen Your Tent      and that's your own self.
- https://amzn.to/2JRxnDF             - Aldous Huxley



Go to top.

Message: 4
From: Rabbi Meir G. Rabi
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 00:07:24 +1000
Subject:
[Avodah] NOT Banned as Kitniyot during Pesach - pop-corn,


It seems that everyone, even Ashkenasim who refrain from Kitniyos, may
enjoy pop-corn, peanuts and peanut butter during Pesach.

INTRODUCTION

The Kitniyos ban was initiated when everyone was baking Matza at home
throughout Pesach. This Matza was 10-12mm thick, soft and chewy, and was a
stringency imposed to not make Matza 50-60mm thick, as they used to in
earlier times. Such Matza was familiar to the ChChaim and other Poskim and
they write about it without any suggestion of protest [MAvraham, ShA HaRav,
ArHaShulchan and MBerruah [486:3] describe Matza as Rachos VeAsuYos KeSeFog
- soft and spongy]

Everyone was familiar with the need to complete the Matza manufacturing
within ?18 minutes?. The severe consequence of Chamets was universally
known and respected. It would be unthinkable to have even the slightest
concern that even the most uninformed part of the population would go
anywhere near violating this prohibition.

However, it was suspected that some may err when seeing knowledgeable Gd
Fearing people cooking Kitniyot porridge, and draw the false conclusion
that Chamets is only problem when baking with flour but there is no problem
when cooking grains as a porridge and will therefore cook wheat or barley
porridge during Pesach.

This is the essence of the ShA HaRav. He makes no mention of baking, KVCh
of flour, his Kitniyot discussion is limited to Tavshil, porridge.

=   =   =   =   =   =   =

ShA HaRav 453: 3&4

Al HaTorah
https://library.alhatorah.org/?r1=Shulchan_Arukh_HaRav_Orach_Chayyim_453

my translation.

Take note he speaks exclusively about Tavshil, he makes no mention of
Kitniyot flour, he makes no reference to banning baked, non-Tavshil foods
even though they have been combined with water.



The custom in these locations is to refrain from eating a Tavshil [cooked
recipe] of Kitniyos

Not even on the last day of the Chag [when people eat Gebrochts]

The reason for this is, there many who are not familiar with these
intricate laws

And upon observing that during Pesach a Kitniyos Tavshil is being consumed

Will erroneously permit cooking a similar Chamets Tavshil

Since all year round Tavshillim are cooked from both wheat etc and also
Kitniyos

It would seem therefore that porridge of any grain is permitted

[However] the custom only applies to those Kitniyos

Whose [cooked recipe] Tavshil might be mistaken for a similar recipe made
from wheat

As they are very similar as both are known as MaAseh KeDeiRah [porridge]

=   =   =   =   =   =   =

The Levush [453] goes a bit further adding BAKING bread, but does not
mention the word ?flour?. Upon a close reading of the Levush it is clear he
is not discussing regular bread made from flour, because his concern is not
that the dough becomes Chamets but that the wheat kernel will be swollen
i.e. Chamets. So he too is not discussing the bread we are familiar with
but the same type of porridge which is not cooked but baked into some type
of loaf



In these locations the custom is to not eat cooked Kitniyot dishes,

Similarly mustard [they cooked mustard? See 462]

Even though these cannot become Chamets

They are prohibited by decree to prevent confusion with the 5 grains that
do become Chamets

Since Kitniyot and the 5 grains are both cooked as a porridge

The decree prevents people mistakenly thinking that cooking porridge is not
Chamets [they were baking Matza throughout Pesach and knew that it must be
baked quickly to prevent it becoming Chamets but people may think that
cooking does not make Chamets]

Furthermore, some make Kitniyos ?bread? which might be confused with other
breads and will even eat bread that includes a kernel of wheat that became
swollen and is Chamets

And sometimes wheat grains are mixed amongst the Kitniyot and are very
difficult to locate and remove, and these wheat grains that have become
Chamets will be baked amongst the Kitnoyot grains and will not be Battel
since they are baked during Pesach

And that is the reason we strictly prohibit Kitniyot

Nevertheless, we do not prohibit foods that Kitniyot inadvertently fell into

And we may light with Kitniyot oil [it is not banned as an unacceptable
risk because the oil in the lamps often drips into the foods]

And no penalty is applied if oil does drip into the food.

And they may be kept in the home [unlike Chamets which we worry may be
inadvertently consumed and must therefore be removed]

=   =   =   =   =   =   =

MBerrurah 453:6

Al HaTorah
https://shulchanarukh.alhatorah.org/Dual/Mishna_Berurah/Orach_Chayyim/453.5#m7e0n6


Although the MBerrurah adds flour to the ban, he does not ban eating
Kitniyot that have not been combined with water and baked or cooked i.e.
peanuts, peanut butter, pop-corn, fresh peas and beans, and one may
legitimately speculate about cooking Kitniyot that are not at risk of
containing wheat, like tinned peas.

The reason for this stringency is that Sometimes wheat is found amongst
Kitniyot and they cannot be identified and removed with confidence, and
will become Chamets when baked or cooked

Furthermore, Kitniyot is often ground into flour and often baked as bread
and many will confuse them and will end up being lenient both with bread
and with flour

Accordingly all breads and cooked recipes of Kitniyot are banned

and even cooking whole Kitniyot is banned

Besides there is a concern that there may be wheat amongst the Kitniyot

=   =   =   =   =   =

It seems that everyone, even Ashkenasim who refrain from Kitniyos, may
enjoy pop-corn, peanuts and peanut butter during Pesach.


Best,

Meir G. Rabi

0423 207 837
+61 423 207 837
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20240419/0faca538/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------



_______________________________________________
Avodah mailing list
Avo...@lists.aishdas.org
http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org


------------------------------


**************************************

Send Avodah mailing list submissions to
	avodah@lists.aishdas.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodahareivim-membership-agreement/


You can reach the person managing the list at
	avodah-owner@lists.aishdas.org


When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Avodah digest..."

A list of common acronyms is available at
        http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodah-acronyms
(They are also visible in the web archive copy of each digest.)


< Previous Next >