Avodah Mailing List

Volume 41: Number 44

Wed, 07 Jun 2023

< Previous Next >
Subjects Discussed In This Issue:
Message: 1
From: Akiva Miller
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 23:56:57 -0400
Subject:
Re: [Avodah] shoa


.
R' Joel Rich asked:

> A recent article made the case that the shoa was sui
> generis in Jewish history. Would you agree or disagree?
> (more of interest to me ? why?)

It would be a lot easier to respond to that article if you'd give us a link
or some other reference to it. But, given this short post, I'll offer some
ideas.

R' Micha Berger responded:

> I can see only two options: Either the Shoa was Chevlei
> Mashiach, ... Or, chas vechalila, it wasn't Chevlei Mashiach. ...

I see a third option. Note that the word "chevlei" is plural. Perhaps the
Shoa was one event in a series of events, which collectively constitute
"Chevlei Mashiach". I have always been taught that all of the pogroms etc
of the past 19.5 centuries are all tafel to Churban Bayis Sheni.

See, for example, Igros Moshe YD 4:57:11, where Rav Moshe explains that
Chmelnitzki was an exception that proves the rule: The gezeros of Tach
V'Tat were not government programs, but rebellious uprisings *against* the
government. Hitler ym"sh and all other government actions were merely
continuations of Tisha B'Av.

R' Micha Berger also wrote:

> Not "only" numerically, but theologically also, it left us
> bereft in a way no other tragedy did before.

Do you have data on this? I'm not disagreeing with you, I just have no idea
what the actual numbers are. For example, how many Jews were murdered in
the Crusades? Either as raw numbers, or as a percentage of world Jewry, I'd
like to know. (Yes, I am aware that the Crusades lasted much longer than
the Nazis, but still, some cold numbers would be the starting point for
comparisions.)

Akiva Miller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20230603/3112b5a1/attachment-0001.htm>


Go to top.

Message: 2
From: Micha Berger
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:40:08 -0400
Subject:
Re: [Avodah] shoa


On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 11:56:57PM -0400, Akiva Miller via Avodah wrote:
>> I can see only two options: Either the Shoa was Chevlei
>> Mashiach, ... Or, chas vechalila, it wasn't Chevlei Mashiach. ...
> 
> I see a third option. Note that the word "chevlei" is plural. Perhaps the
> Shoa was one event in a series of events, which collectively constitute
> "Chevlei Mashiach". I have always been taught that all of the pogroms etc
> of the past 19.5 centuries are all tafel to Churban Bayis Sheni.

This explains this differing minhagim about commemorating the other
tragedies on Tish'ah beAv or Asarah beTeiveis. (The Gush sends out
one of R Amital's thoughts on the Shoah every 10 beTeiveis. I find it
particularly meaningful, since a survivor who is also a gadol beTorah
has a perspective on it I cannot otherwise get.)

But...

Sanhedrin 97a discusses the 7 years before mashiach comes. It's not
actually titled "chevlei mashiach" or even iqvisa demeshicha, but I
have to admit I usually assumed that's what the idiom referred to.

The Maharal ad loc
https://beta.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14192&;st=&pgnum=208
takes this as a shemittah cycle, and waxes poetic about how the
*eighth* year is the appropriate year for mashiach. So he held the
seven years was quite literally 7 consecutive years.

A blatt later (98b) we hear of a Edom (Rome? Western?) conquest of Israel
for at leat 9 months, and Ulla and Rabba each wish that the mashiach
come, but after his death so he wouldn't have to live through it.
(R Yosef is more brave.)

Abayei calls this "chevlo shel mashiach". So, this seems to pretty
clearly put it (note the singular conjugation) at the end of history,
not as a feature of the whole duration of galus.

The Gra (Yahel Or, on the Zohar 2:119b) says the 70 words of Tehillim 20
("LaMnatzeiach") correspond to the 70 years of chevlei mashiach at the end
of Galus Edom. "Heimah kar'u venafalu, va'anachnu qamnu vanis'odad. H'
Hoshia, haMelekh ya'aneinu beyom qor'einu." Not 7, but also a specific
time period at the end of galus.

> R' Micha Berger also wrote:
> > Not "only" numerically, but theologically also, it left us
> > bereft in a way no other tragedy did before.

> Do you have data on this? I'm not disagreeing with you, I just have no idea
> what the actual numbers are. For example, how many Jews were murdered in
> the Crusades? ..

Estimates vary widely from "thousands" to "tens of thousands". I took this
to mean that even the top of the range is below 50,000.

Mainz was about 900 casualties.

(Chabad.org went with "Estimates of the toll taken on the Jewish
communities range from 3,000 to 10,000 deaths.")

Estimates for the Inquisition (which trapped some 300,000 Jews) are between
2,000 and 5,000 murdered.

Percentagewise, Khmelnytsky (Tach beTat) was worse -- Shaul Shtampfer
estimates 18,000 - 20,000 Jews were killed of a total population of
40,000.

Notice none of these numbers come remotely close.

The real candidate is the fall of Yerushalayim. The problem is that qinos
are poetry, Josephus exagerates and we don't have any sober estimates at
all about how many died fighting or were civilians murdered when the Romans
suppressed our rebellion.


Tir'u baTov!
-Micha

-- 
Micha Berger                 A person must be very patient
http://www.aishdas.org/asp   even with himself.
Author: Widen Your Tent            - attributed to R' Nachman of Breslov
- https://amzn.to/2JRxnDF


------------------------------



_______________________________________________
Avodah mailing list
Avo...@lists.aishdas.org
http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org


------------------------------


**************************************

Send Avodah mailing list submissions to
	avodah@lists.aishdas.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodahareivim-membership-agreement/


You can reach the person managing the list at
	avodah-owner@lists.aishdas.org


When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Avodah digest..."

A list of common acronyms is available at
        http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodah-acronyms
(They are also visible in the web archive copy of each digest.)


< Previous Next >